Aptitude::Statement and Conclusion
Home > Logical Reasoning > Statement and Conclusion > Subjective Solved Examples
Accenture (150)
Adobe (4)
Alcatel-Lucent (2)
Broadcom Ltd (33)
Aricent (7)
Amazon (9)
Wipro (378)
Tech Mahindra (432)
IBM (455)
BOA (Bank of America) (70)
Capgemini (489)
Commvault (40)
Nagarro (80)
TCS (677)
Infosys (297)
Cognizant (128)
Mu-Sigma (25)
HCL Technologies (112)
Virtusa (121)
CGI (50)
Syntel Inc. (91)
ThoughtWorks (33)
iGate (356)
Cisco (127)
Global Edge (166)
Green Valley Motor (76)
Sopra Steria (83)
Societe Generale (224)
L&T Infotech (17)
MindTree (60)
SAP Labs (27)
Hexaware Technologies (60)
TCS NQT (612)
TCS Digital (95)
TCS Ninja (80)
Huawei (50)
Wipro NLTH (175)
Reliance Jio (26)
Radisys (2)
GlobalLogic (2)
Brocade (2)
Sapient (1)
(2)
Acuvate Software (1)
Citrix (2)
Goldman Sachs (1)
Happiest Minds (1)
Deloitte (2)
Example 1 / 11
Delhi Chief Minister stated that the dropout rate from Government School is increasing and it is very concerning the topic.
Conclusion:
I. The concern is growing about the dilemma of the students in Delhi.
II. Government schools in Delhi are not providing satisfactory education.
Option:
A. Only conclusion I follows
B. Only conclusion II follows
C. Either I or II follows
D. Neither I nor II follows
E. Both I and II follow
It is clear from the statement that the dropout from government schools are increasing because of some difficulty and this issue is concerning the Chief Minister. Nowhere in the sentence, it is mentioned the reason behind dropouts. Therefore, only conclusion II follows the statement.Ans.
NA
NA
NA
Example 2 / 11
As soon as the restaurant manager replaced the chef the sales doubled.
Conclusion:
I. The old chief was not good therefore the manager replaced him.
II. The restaurant was not earning any profit earlier.
Option:
A. Only conclusion I follows
B. Only conclusion II follows
C. Either I or II follows
D. Neither I nor II follows
E. Both I and II follow
Since the statement does not make it clear why Jackson was insulted we cannot say that the superintendent did not like Jackson or he misbehaved with the superintendent. Therefore, both conclusion I and II does not follow the statement.Ans.
NA
NA
NA
Example 3 / 11
The superintendent insulted Jackson in front of the staff.
Conclusion:
I. The superintendent did not like Jackson
II. Jackson misbehaved with the superintendent
Option:
A. Only conclusion I follows
B. Only conclusion II follows
C. Either I or II follows
D. Neither I nor II follows
E. Both I and II follow
Since the statement does not make it clear why Jackson was insulted we cannot say that the superintendent did not like Jackson or he misbehaved with the superintendent. Therefore, both conclusion I and II does not follow the statement.Ans.
NA
NA
NA
Example 4 / 11
In 2016 company A’s profits were 150000. In 2017 its profit was 20000. The company faces loss in 2018, doubled as it earned a profit in both 2016 and 2017.
Conclusions:
I. The overall profit earned by company A in 2016 and 2017 was 170000.
II. Company A earned a loss of 150000 in 2018.
Option:
A. Only conclusion I follows
B. Only conclusion II follows
C. Either I or II follows
D. Neither I nor II follows
E. Both I and II follow
We can determine from the statement that the company earned 170000 (150000 + 20000) profit in 2016 and 2017. And had a loss of 170000 in 2018. Therefore, the only conclusion I follow the statement.Ans.
NA
NA
NA
Example 5 / 11
The staffing committee shortlisted those applicants who have a minimum of 55% throughout their academics career. Sakshi scored 72% in 10th and 70% in 12th standard. She completed her graduation with 66% marks.
Conclusion:
I. Sakshi will be shortlisted
II. Sakshi will not be shortlisted
Option:
A. Only conclusion I follows
B. Only conclusion II follows
C. Either I or II follows
D. Neither I nor II follows
E. Both I and II follow
Sakshi scored 72% in the 10th and 70% in the 12th standard. She secured 66% in her graduation exam. Therefore, she is qualified to be shortlisted.Ans.
NA
NA
NA
Example 6 / 11
In the cricket match, Avinash scored 150 runs. Out of which 6 boundaries were there and 8 sixes.
Conclusion:
I. Avinash scored 48 runs from sixes
II. Avinash scored 78 runs from running between the wickets.
Option:
A. Only conclusion I follows
B. Only conclusion II follows
C. Either I or II follows
D. Neither I nor II follows
E. Both I and II follow
We can determine from the statement that Avinash scored 150 runs.
6 boundaries = 6 * 4 =24
8 sixes = 6* 8 = 48
Remaining = 150 – 72 = 78.
Therefore, he scored 78 runs from running between the wickets.
Thus, both conclusions follow the statement.Ans.
6 boundaries = 6 * 4 =24
8 sixes = 6* 8 = 48
Remaining = 150 – 72 = 78.
Therefore, he scored 78 runs from running between the wickets.
Thus, both conclusions follow the statement.Ans.
NA
NA
NA
Example 7 / 11
How To Solve Statement and Conclusions Questions Quickly- When only conclusions (i) follows
Statement:
Jack planned to propose Rose near the Taj Mahal on New Year’s Eve, but the entry was closed.
Conclusion:
I. Entry at the Taj Mahal remains closed on New Year’s Eve.
II. Taj Mahal is the seventh wonder of the world.
Option:
A. Only conclusion I follows
B. Only conclusion II follows
C. Either I or II follows
D. Neither I nor II follows
E. Both I and II follow
Only conclusion I follow the statement above as nowhere it is mentioned in the statement about the seventh wonder of the world.Ans.
NA
NA
NA
Example 8 / 11
How To Solve Quickly Questions on Statement and Conclusions- When only conclusion (ii) follows
Statement:
A survey portrays that walking daily for one hour can help you keep yourself away from a heart attack.
Conclusion:
I. People with a heart problems can cure it by walking for one hour daily.
II. Walking daily is good for health.
Option:
A. Only conclusion I follows
B. Only conclusion II follows
C. Either I or II follows
D. Neither I nor II follows
E. Both I and II follow
The statement above says that walk for one hour daily will keep you at distance from heart attack. It does not say that it would cure heart problem. Therefore, conclusion I does not follow the statement. But from the statement it is clear that walking is good for health.Ans.
NA
NA
NA
Example 9 / 11
How To Solve Statement and Conclusions Questions Quickly: When either conclusion I or II follows
Statement:
If you consistently work hard you will definitely get success in future.
Conclusion:
I. Lokesh worked hard and consistently in exam, he will get success in the exam
II. Lokesh did not work hard in exam, he is going to fail in the exam.
Option:
A. Only conclusion I follows
B. Only conclusion II follows
C. Either I or II follows
D. Neither I nor II follows
E. Both I and II follow
It is clearly mentioned in the statement that those who will work hard will get success. Therefore, if Lokesh work hard he will get success and if he do not work hard he will get failure. Thus, either conclusion I or II can follow the statement.Ans.
NA
NA
NA
Example 10 / 11
Statement and Conclusions Solve Questions Quickly :- When neither conclusion 1 nor 2 follows
Statement:
All those who successfully cleared their graduation with 65% marks can participate in the Quiz. However, students who are giving the final semester are also eligible.
Conclusion:
I. All the candidates who have cleared graduation can participate in the quiz.
II. It is necessary to acquire 65% in all academic years to appear for the quiz.
Option:
A. Only conclusion I follows
B. Only conclusion II follows
C. Either I or II follows
D. Neither I nor II follows
E. Both I and II follow
The statement clearly states that only those who have graduated with 65% marks along with final semester students can appear for the quiz.
Therefore, both conclusion I and II does not follow the statement.Ans.
Therefore, both conclusion I and II does not follow the statement.Ans.
NA
NA
NA
Example 11 / 11
How to Solve Statement and Conclusion Question Quickly: When both conclusion 1 and 2 follows
Statement:
The training and placement officer instructed students to properly fill the registration form to appear in the written test for interview. The applicants who fails to match the company criteria will not be eligible for the interview.
Conclusion:
I. The applicants will be called for an interview if they fulfill all the eligibility criteria.
II. Written test will only be held after the proper registration of the applicants.
Option:
A. Only conclusion I follows
B. Only conclusion II follows
C. Either I or II follows
D. Neither I nor II follows
E. Both I and II follow
The statement above states that to apply for the interview and written test applicant must fulfill the eligibility criteria and should properly fill all the registration steps. Therefore, both the conditions follow the statement.Ans.
NA
NA
NA
